How Jane Hume voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should give the immigration minister the power to revoke the citizenship of people who have dual nationality (that is, are also citizens of another country) if they take part in certain terrorism-related offences

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for revoking citizenship of dual nationals involved with terrorism offences by the minister” which Jane Hume could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jane Hume on this policy.

Division Jane Hume Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for revoking citizenship of dual nationals involved with terrorism offences by the minister” which Jane Hume could have attended.

Division Jane Hume Supporters vote

3rd Sep 2020, 4:22 PM – Senate Australian Citizenship Amendment (Citizenship Cessation) Bill 2020 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea

Yes Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Jane Hume has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.