How Jane Hume voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should amend current laws in order to address the current power disparity between franchisor and franchisee

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing protections for franchisees” which Jane Hume could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jane Hume on this policy.

Division Jane Hume Supporters vote

22nd Feb 2021, 12:49 PM – Senate Franchising Laws Amendment (Fairness in Franchising) Bill 2020 - Third Reading - Pass the bill

absent Yes

22nd Feb 2021, 12:41 PM – Senate Franchising Laws Amendment (Fairness in Franchising) Bill 2020 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea

absent Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing protections for franchisees” which Jane Hume could have attended.

Division Jane Hume Supporters vote
no votes listed

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Jane Hume was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.