We can't say anything concrete about how James Paterson voted on increasing state and territory environmental approval powers
How James Paterson voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should give greater environmental approval powers to state and territory governments by creating a single environmental assessment and approval process for nationally protected matters that is administered at state and territory level
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing state and territory environmental approval powers” which James Paterson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of James Paterson on this policy.
| Division | James Paterson | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing state and territory environmental approval powers” which James Paterson could have attended.
| Division | James Paterson | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
18th Feb 2021, 12:35 PM – Senate Motions - Environmental Legislation - National standards |
No | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
James Paterson has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.