We can't say anything concrete about how James Paterson voted on banning mobiles and other devices in immigration detention
How James Paterson voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should give the Minister the power to prohibit items such as mobile phones, SIM cards and internet capable devices for people in immigration detention facilities
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for banning mobiles and other devices in immigration detention” which James Paterson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of James Paterson on this policy.
| Division | James Paterson | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
6th Dec 2018, 3:52 PM – Senate Home Affairs Legislation Amendment (Miscellaneous Measures) Bill 2018 - in Committee - Prohibiting items in immigration detention facilities (including mobile phones) |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for banning mobiles and other devices in immigration detention” which James Paterson could have attended.
| Division | James Paterson | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case James Paterson was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.