We can't say anything concrete about how James Paterson voted on MacMines' proposed China Stone coal mine in the Galilee Basin
How James Paterson voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should support MacMines' plans to build the China Stone coal mine in Queensland's Galilee Basin
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for MacMines' proposed China Stone coal mine in the Galilee Basin” which James Paterson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of James Paterson on this policy.
| Division | James Paterson | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for MacMines' proposed China Stone coal mine in the Galilee Basin” which James Paterson could have attended.
| Division | James Paterson | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
28th Nov 2018, 3:55 PM – Senate Motions - Coalmines in the Galilee Basin - Refuse |
absent | No |
27th Nov 2018, 4:51 PM – Senate Motions - Mining - Water environmental assessment |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case James Paterson was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.