Compare how James Paterson and Jonathon Duniam voted on a review of our representatives' eligibility
![Photo of James Paterson](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/images/mpsL/10845.jpg)
James Paterson
Liberal Party Senator for Victoria since March 2016
![Photo of Jonathon Duniam](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/images/mpsL/10847.jpg)
Jonathon Duniam
Liberal Party Senator for Tasmania since July 2016
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should conduct a review of our senators and members of parliament (MPs) to make sure that they are all eligible to represent us in Parliament under the Australian Constitution
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a review of our representatives' eligibility” which either James Paterson or Jonathon Duniam could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of James Paterson and Jonathon Duniam on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | James Paterson | Jonathon Duniam | Supporters vote | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a review of our representatives' eligibility” which either James Paterson or Jonathon Duniam could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | James Paterson | Jonathon Duniam | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|---|
5th Sep 2017, 5:17 PM – Senate Committees - Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee - Reference |
No | No | Yes |
4th Sep 2017, 10:50 AM – Senate Motions - Parliamentary Representation - Qualifications of Senators |
No | No | Yes |
15th Aug 2017, 3:53 PM – Senate Committees - Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee - Reference |
No | No | Yes |
9th Aug 2017, 4:42 PM – Senate Committees - Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee - Reference |
No | No | Yes |