How Jacinta Collins voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal governmnet should increase parliamentary entitlements for current MPs and Senators, such as legitimate expenditure, salary packages, superannuation entitlements and/or other allowances like the printing allowance

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing parliamentary entitlements for current MPs and Senators” which Jacinta Collins could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jacinta Collins on this policy.

Division Jacinta Collins Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing parliamentary entitlements for current MPs and Senators” which Jacinta Collins could have attended.

Division Jacinta Collins Supporters vote

21st Mar 2017, 4:08 PM – Senate Motions - Parliamentarians' Entitlements - Do not increase remuneration until in surplus

absent No

14th May 2009, 10:34 AM – Senate Motions - Remuneration Tribunal Determination - Electorate allowance

absent No

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Jacinta Collins was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.