Compare how Jacinta Collins and Tim Storer voted on political intervention in research funding grants

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for political intervention in research funding grants” which either Jacinta Collins or Tim Storer could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jacinta Collins and Tim Storer on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Jacinta Collins	Tim Storer	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for political intervention in research funding grants” which either Jacinta Collins or Tim Storer could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Jacinta Collins	Tim Storer	Supporters vote
4th Dec 2018, 4:37 PM – Senate Motions - Australian Research Council - Remove National Interest Test	Yes	Yes	No
13th Nov 2018, 3:52 PM – Senate Documents - Australian Research Council - Order for the Production of Documents	Yes	Yes	No