We can't say anything concrete about how Greg Mirabella voted on speeding things along in Parliament (procedural)
How Greg Mirabella voted compared to someone who agrees that Members of Parliament (MPs) and Senators should vote to speed things along by supporting motions to 'put the question' (known as 'closure' or 'gag' motions), which require Parliament to immediately vote on a question rather than debating it any further
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for speeding things along in Parliament (procedural)” which Greg Mirabella could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Greg Mirabella on this policy.
| Division | Greg Mirabella | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for speeding things along in Parliament (procedural)” which Greg Mirabella could have attended.
| Division | Greg Mirabella | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
10th Feb 2022, 12:11 PM – Senate Business - Consideration of Legislation - Exempt from Standing Order 111 |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Greg Mirabella has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.