We can't say anything concrete about how David Van voted on a referendum on the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice
How David Van voted compared to someone who agrees that there should be a referendum on the question of whether the Constitution should be amended to include a requirement for an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice to federal parliament, such as that envisaged by the Uluru Statement from the Heart
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a referendum on the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice” which David Van could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of David Van on this policy.
| Division | David Van | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
19th Jun 2023, 11:11 AM – Senate Constitution Alteration (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice) 2023 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
16th Jun 2023, 6:34 PM – Senate Constitution Alteration (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice) 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
16th Jun 2023, 4:13 AM – Senate Constitution Alteration (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice) 2023 - in Committee - Agree with the bill |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a referendum on the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice” which David Van could have attended.
| Division | David Van | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case David Van was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.