We can't say anything concrete about how Bridget McKenzie voted on introducing digital ID
How Bridget McKenzie voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation to establish digital ID in Australia
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for introducing digital ID” which Bridget McKenzie could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bridget McKenzie on this policy.
| Division | Bridget McKenzie | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
27th Mar 2024, 5:54 PM – Senate Digital Id Bill 2023, Digital Id (Transitional and Consequential Provisions) Bill 2023 - Third Reading - Pass the bills |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for introducing digital ID” which Bridget McKenzie could have attended.
| Division | Bridget McKenzie | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Bridget McKenzie was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.