We can't say anything concrete about how Bridget McKenzie voted on placing the CFMEU into administration
How Bridget McKenzie voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should put the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (CFMEU) into administration
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for placing the CFMEU into administration” which Bridget McKenzie could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bridget McKenzie on this policy.
| Division | Bridget McKenzie | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
19th Aug 2024, 6:58 PM – Senate Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Amendment (Administration) Bill 2024 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
19th Aug 2024, 6:35 PM – Senate Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Amendment (Administration) Bill 2024 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for placing the CFMEU into administration” which Bridget McKenzie could have attended.
| Division | Bridget McKenzie | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Bridget McKenzie was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.