We can't say anything concrete about how Bridget McKenzie voted on revoking citizenship of dual nationals involved with terrorism offences by the courts
How Bridget McKenzie voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should give the Minister for Home Affairs the power to apply to the courts to revoke the citizenship of people who have dual nationality (that is, are also citizens of another country) if they take part in certain terrorism-related offences [NOTE: this policy is related to an older policy titled "Revoking citizenship of dual nationals involved with terrorism offences by the minister"]
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for revoking citizenship of dual nationals involved with terrorism offences by the courts” which Bridget McKenzie could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bridget McKenzie on this policy.
| Division | Bridget McKenzie | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
6th Dec 2023, 12:50 PM – Senate Australian Citizenship Amendment (Citizenship Repudiation) Bill 2023 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for revoking citizenship of dual nationals involved with terrorism offences by the courts” which Bridget McKenzie could have attended.
| Division | Bridget McKenzie | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Bridget McKenzie was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.