We can't say anything concrete about how Bridget McKenzie voted on reproductive bodily autonomy
How Bridget McKenzie voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should ensure that Australian laws protect the reproductive bodily autonomy of women and other people capable of childbearing by, for example, protecting them from pregnancy-related discrimination and ensuring they have access to pregnancy-related healthcare services, which include affordable contraception, maternity care and abortion services
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for reproductive bodily autonomy” which Bridget McKenzie could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bridget McKenzie on this policy.
| Division | Bridget McKenzie | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for reproductive bodily autonomy” which Bridget McKenzie could have attended.
| Division | Bridget McKenzie | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
16th Oct 2019 – Senate Motions - Abortion - Congratulate NSW |
absent | Yes |
14th Feb 2018, 4:41 PM – Senate Motions - Abortion - Alternatives and counselling |
absent | No |
7th Feb 2018, 3:56 PM – Senate Motions - Reproductive Health Services - Availability of abortion services |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Bridget McKenzie has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.