We can't say anything concrete about how Wendy Askew voted on encouraging Australian-based industry
How Wendy Askew voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should encourage Australian-based industry and secure the jobs these industries create by, for example, providing incentives for companies to stay in Australia (note that there are specific policies in respect to the timber, dairy, shipping, coal, and film & TV industries so votes on those subjects are not included here)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for encouraging Australian-based industry” which Wendy Askew could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Wendy Askew on this policy.
| Division | Wendy Askew | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for encouraging Australian-based industry” which Wendy Askew could have attended.
| Division | Wendy Askew | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
12th Nov 2020, 12:18 PM – Senate Motions - COVID-19 - Employment |
absent | Yes |
4th Jul 2019, 1:11 PM – Senate Motions - Energy - Exports and cost of energy |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Wendy Askew has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.