How Wendy Askew voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase legal protections for women in the workplace, particularly in respect to sex discrimination and harassment

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing workplace protections for women” which Wendy Askew could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Wendy Askew on this policy.

Division Wendy Askew Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing workplace protections for women” which Wendy Askew could have attended.

Division Wendy Askew Supporters vote

1st Sep 2021, 6:28 PM – Senate Sex Discrimination and Fair Work (Respect at Work) Amendment Bill 2021 - in Committee - Overly high threshold

absent Yes

1st Sep 2021, 6:05 PM – Senate Sex Discrimination and Fair Work (Respect at Work) Amendment Bill 2021 - in Committee - Unions, complaints mechanism and sex-based harassment

absent Yes

1st Sep 2021, 12:13 PM – Senate Sex Discrimination and Fair Work (Respect at Work) Amendment Bill 2021 - in Committee - Prohibition against sexual harassment

absent Yes

1st Sep 2021, 12:01 PM – Senate Sex Discrimination and Fair Work (Respect at Work) Amendment Bill 2021 - in Committee - Substantive gender equality

absent Yes

1st Sep 2021, 11:45 AM – Senate Sex Discrimination and Fair Work (Respect at Work) Amendment Bill 2021 - in Committee - Cost protection

absent Yes

1st Sep 2021, 11:29 AM – Senate Sex Discrimination and Fair Work (Respect at Work) Amendment Bill 2021 - in Committee - Positive duty amendment

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Wendy Askew was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.