We can't say anything concrete about how Tammy Tyrrell voted on climate change inaction
How Tammy Tyrrell voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should do nothing to address climate change
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for climate change inaction” which Tammy Tyrrell could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Tammy Tyrrell on this policy.
| Division | Tammy Tyrrell | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for climate change inaction” which Tammy Tyrrell could have attended.
| Division | Tammy Tyrrell | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
1st Aug 2023, 4:12 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Climate Change - "Fearmongering" |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Tammy Tyrrell was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.