We can't say anything concrete about how Steve Martin voted on decreasing availability of welfare payments
How Steve Martin voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should limit the availability of government social security payments
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for decreasing availability of welfare payments” which Steve Martin could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Steve Martin on this policy.
Division | Steve Martin | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
3rd Dec 2018, 9:00 PM – Senate Social Services and Other Legislation Amendment (Promoting Sustainable Welfare) Bill 2018 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
3rd Dec 2018, 8:20 PM – Senate Social Services and Other Legislation Amendment (Promoting Sustainable Welfare) Bill 2018 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for decreasing availability of welfare payments” which Steve Martin could have attended.
Division | Steve Martin | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
12th Nov 2018, 4:54 PM – Senate Motions - Anti-Poverty Week - Against punitive approach to social policy |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Steve Martin was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.