How Steve Martin voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should support the rights of transgender people (including genderfluid, nonbinary and genderqueer people) by amending laws and policies to support healthy lives by, for example, ensuring that appropriate healthcare is available nationwide and that trans people are protected from discrimination and harassment

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for transgender rights” which Steve Martin could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Steve Martin on this policy.

Division Steve Martin Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for transgender rights” which Steve Martin could have attended.

Division Steve Martin Supporters vote

3rd Dec 2018, 4:33 PM – Senate Motions - Gender and Sexual Orientation - Healthcare and gender diverse treatment

absent Yes

16th Aug 2018, 12:37 PM – Senate Motions - Free Speech - Against gender neutral language

No No

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Steve Martin has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.