How Steve Martin voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should support MacMines' plans to build the China Stone coal mine in Queensland's Galilee Basin

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for MacMines' proposed China Stone coal mine in the Galilee Basin” which Steve Martin could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Steve Martin on this policy.

Division Steve Martin Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for MacMines' proposed China Stone coal mine in the Galilee Basin” which Steve Martin could have attended.

Division Steve Martin Supporters vote

28th Nov 2018, 3:55 PM – Senate Motions - Coalmines in the Galilee Basin - Refuse

absent No

27th Nov 2018, 4:51 PM – Senate Motions - Mining - Water environmental assessment

absent No

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Steve Martin was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.