We can't say anything concrete about how Steve Martin voted on unconventional gas mining
How Steve Martin voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should allow companies to mine coal seam (CSG), tight and shale gas
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for unconventional gas mining” which Steve Martin could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Steve Martin on this policy.
| Division | Steve Martin | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for unconventional gas mining” which Steve Martin could have attended.
| Division | Steve Martin | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
12th Feb 2019 – Senate Motions - Great Australian Bight - End oil and gas drilling |
No | No |
29th Nov 2018, 12:39 PM – Senate Motions - Coal Seam Gas Mining - Condemn lifting WA fracking moratorium |
absent | No |
18th Oct 2018, 12:32 PM – Senate Motions - Underground Coal Gasification - Ban |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Steve Martin has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.