How Steve Martin voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should maintain or increase its investment in and support for the Australian coal industry

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing investment in the coal industry” which Steve Martin could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Steve Martin on this policy.

Division Steve Martin Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing investment in the coal industry” which Steve Martin could have attended.

Division Steve Martin Supporters vote

4th Dec 2018, 6:19 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Climate Change - Coal exports

absent No

4th Dec 2018, 4:42 PM – Senate Motions - Mining - Support Adani

absent Yes

28th Nov 2018, 3:55 PM – Senate Motions - Coalmines in the Galilee Basin - Refuse

absent No

27th Nov 2018, 4:51 PM – Senate Motions - Mining - Water environmental assessment

absent No

26th Nov 2018, 5:20 PM – Senate Motions - Coal-Fired Power Stations - Good for economy and regional jobs

absent Yes

27th Jun 2018, 4:20 PM – Senate Motions - Energy - More coal-fired power stations

Yes Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Steve Martin has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.