How Stephen Parry voted compared to someone who agrees that environmental and conservation groups should be able to challenge the legality of federal government decisions made under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) (in other words, they should have standing to seek judicial review under that Act)

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for letting environmental groups challenge the legality of certain government decisions” which Stephen Parry could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Stephen Parry on this policy.

Division Stephen Parry Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for letting environmental groups challenge the legality of certain government decisions” which Stephen Parry could have attended.

Division Stephen Parry Supporters vote

11th Nov 2015 – Senate Motions - Legal System - Stop environmental groups from challenging government decisions

Yes No

20th Aug 2015, 12:18 PM – Senate Motions - Galilee Basin - Stop legal actions by anti-coal activists

absent No

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Stephen Parry has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.