We can't say anything concrete about how Stephen Parry voted on expanding public funded dental care
How Stephen Parry voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should expand public funded dental care
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for expanding public funded dental care” which Stephen Parry could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Stephen Parry on this policy.
Division | Stephen Parry | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for expanding public funded dental care” which Stephen Parry could have attended.
Division | Stephen Parry | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
10th Aug 2017, 12:21 PM – Senate Motions - Suspension of Standing Orders - Public dental care |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Stephen Parry was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.