We can't say anything concrete about how Richard Colbeck voted on climate change mitigation strategies
How Richard Colbeck voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should encourage climate mitigation strategies, including carbon capture and storage (CCS) and marine geoengineering
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for climate change mitigation strategies” which Richard Colbeck could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Richard Colbeck on this policy.
| Division | Richard Colbeck | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
13th Nov 2023, 6:32 PM – Senate Environment Protection (Sea Dumping) Amendment (Using New Technologies to Fight Climate Change) Bill 2023 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
7th Nov 2023, 12:07 PM – Senate Environment Protection (Sea Dumping) Amendment (Using New Technologies to Fight Climate Change) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for climate change mitigation strategies” which Richard Colbeck could have attended.
| Division | Richard Colbeck | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
13th Nov 2023, 6:16 PM – Senate Environment Protection (Sea Dumping) Amendment (Using New Technologies to Fight Climate Change) Bill 2023 - in Committee - Keep bill as is |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Richard Colbeck has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.