We can't say anything concrete about how Peter Whish-Wilson voted on considering legislation to create a federal anti-corruption commission (procedural)
How Peter Whish-Wilson voted compared to someone who agrees that the parliament should immediately introduce and debate legislation to create a federal anti-corruption commission, or national integrity commission, that would detect, investigate and prevent corruption at a federal level (NB: this policy is related to our other policy, called "For creating a federal Anti-Corruption Commission")
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for considering legislation to create a federal anti-corruption commission (procedural)” which Peter Whish-Wilson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Peter Whish-Wilson on this policy.
| Division | Peter Whish-Wilson | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for considering legislation to create a federal anti-corruption commission (procedural)” which Peter Whish-Wilson could have attended.
| Division | Peter Whish-Wilson | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
9th Feb 2022, 10:06 AM – Senate Business - Consideration of Legislation - Australian Federal Integrity Commission Bill 2020 |
Yes | Yes |
30th Nov 2021, 12:38 PM – Senate Business - Consideration of Legislation - Australian Federal Integrity Commission Bill 2021 |
absent | Yes |
29th Nov 2021, 3:48 PM – Senate Business - Consideration of Legislation - Australian Federal Integrity Commission Bill 2021 |
absent | Yes |
23rd Nov 2021, 12:40 PM – Senate Business - Consideration of Legislation - Australian Federal Integrity Commission Bill 2021 |
absent | Yes |
21st Oct 2021, 11:25 AM – Senate Motions - National Integrity Commission - National Integrity Commission Bill 2018 (No. 2) |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Peter Whish-Wilson has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.