Compare how Peter Whish-Wilson and Rachel Siewert voted on maintaining or increasing defence spending

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for maintaining or increasing defence spending” which either Peter Whish-Wilson or Rachel Siewert could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Peter Whish-Wilson and Rachel Siewert on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Peter Whish-Wilson	Rachel Siewert	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for maintaining or increasing defence spending” which either Peter Whish-Wilson or Rachel Siewert could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Peter Whish-Wilson	Rachel Siewert	Supporters vote
9th May 2017, 3:56 PM – Senate Motions - Military Unmanned Aerial Vehicles - Fund diplomatic network and aid	Yes	Yes	No
22nd Mar 2017 – Senate Motions - Defence Expenditure - Redirect	Yes	Yes	No