Compare how Peter Whish-Wilson and Rachel Siewert voted on imprisoning immigration detention workers who record or reveal information from their work
Peter Whish-Wilson
Australian Greens Senator for Tasmania since June 2012
Rachel Siewert
Former Australian Greens Senator for WA July 2005 – September 2021
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should make it an offence punishable by imprisonment for Immigration and Border Protection employees, consultants and contractors to record or disclose information that they obtained while working in Australia's immigration detention centres
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for imprisoning immigration detention workers who record or reveal information from their work” which either Peter Whish-Wilson or Rachel Siewert could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Peter Whish-Wilson and Rachel Siewert on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Peter Whish-Wilson | Rachel Siewert | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
14th May 2015, 3:43 PM – Senate Australian Border Force Bill 2015 and related bill - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
No | No | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for imprisoning immigration detention workers who record or reveal information from their work” which either Peter Whish-Wilson or Rachel Siewert could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Peter Whish-Wilson | Rachel Siewert | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
16th Oct 2017, 11:11 AM – Senate Australian Border Force Amendment (Protected Information) Bill 2017 - in Committee - Unauthorised disclosure |
Yes | Yes | No |
16th Oct 2017, 10:53 AM – Senate Australian Border Force Amendment (Protected Information) Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Section 42 |
Yes | Yes | No |
14th May 2015, 1:58 PM – Senate Australian Border Force Bill 2015 and related bill - in Committee - Public interest amendment |
Yes | Yes | No |