Compare how Peter Whish-Wilson and Nova Peris voted on greater public scrutiny of the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for greater public scrutiny of the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations” which either Peter Whish-Wilson or Nova Peris could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Peter Whish-Wilson and Nova Peris on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Peter Whish-Wilson Nova Peris Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for greater public scrutiny of the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations” which either Peter Whish-Wilson or Nova Peris could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Peter Whish-Wilson Nova Peris Supporters vote

13th Oct 2015, 4:02 PM – Senate Motions — Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement

Yes Yes Yes

26th Mar 2015, 1:26 PM – Senate Motions - Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement - Undertake a cost benefit analysis

Yes absent Yes

11th Feb 2015, 3:50 PM – Senate Motions — Request for more transparency in Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal.

Yes Yes Yes

29th Oct 2014 – Senate Motions - Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement - Give members of Parliament access to the draft text

Yes absent Yes