Compare how Nick Sherry and Ruth Webber voted on making more water from Murray-Darling Basin available to use

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for making more water from Murray-Darling Basin available to use” which either Nick Sherry or Ruth Webber could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nick Sherry and Ruth Webber on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Nick Sherry	Ruth Webber	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for making more water from Murray-Darling Basin available to use” which either Nick Sherry or Ruth Webber could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Nick Sherry	Ruth Webber	Supporters vote
9th May 2012, 4:02 PM – Senate Motions - Murray-Darling Basin - Average annual inflows	No	-	Yes
26th Mar 2007, 3:49 PM – Senate Motions - Murray-Darling Basin - Purchase water licences	absent	Yes	No
26th Mar 2007, 3:45 PM – Senate Motions - World Day for Water - South Australian wetlands	absent	Yes	No
7th Dec 2006, 10:03 AM – Senate Motions - Wetlands and Floodplains - Murray Darling	No	No	No