Compare how Nick Sherry and David Feeney voted on increasing political transparency

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing political transparency” which either Nick Sherry or David Feeney could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nick Sherry and David Feeney on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Nick Sherry	David Feeney	Supporters vote
11th Mar 2009, 12:19 PM – Senate Commonwealth Electoral Amendment (Political Donations and Other Measures) Bill 2008 [2009] - Second Reading - Agree to the bill's main idea	Yes	Yes	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing political transparency” which either Nick Sherry or David Feeney could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Nick Sherry	David Feeney	Supporters vote
8th Feb 2007, 10:37 AM – Senate Motions - Government Accountability and Transparency - Canadian bill	Yes	-	Yes