How Nick McKim voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should develop a specific Coronavirus (COVID-19) response package for the Arts and Entertainment sector as many workers in that sector are ineligible for the JobKeeper Payment

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for assisting the Arts sector through the coronavirus pandemic” which Nick McKim could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nick McKim on this policy.

Division Nick McKim Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for assisting the Arts sector through the coronavirus pandemic” which Nick McKim could have attended.

Division Nick McKim Supporters vote

2nd Sep 2021, 10:48 AM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (2021 Measures No. 2) Bill 2021 - in Committee - Live Performance Federal Insurance Guarantee Fund

absent Yes

23rd Feb 2021, 4:57 PM – Senate Motions - Jobkeeper Payment - Arts and Entertainment Industry

Yes Yes

8th Apr 2020, 8:22 PM – Senate Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Payments and Benefits) Bill 2020 and related bills - Second Reading - JobKeeper accessibility and the Arts

absent Yes

8th Apr 2020, 8:19 PM – Senate Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Payments and Benefits) Bill 2020 and related bills - Second Reading - Accessibility of support

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Nick McKim has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.