Compare how Nick McKim and Ralph Babet voted on introducing a Pacific Engagement Visa (PEV)
![Photo of Nick McKim](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/images/mpsL/10841.jpg)
Nick McKim
Australian Greens Senator for Tasmania since August 2015
![Photo of Ralph Babet](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/images/mpsL/11003.jpg)
Ralph Babet
United Australia Party Senator for Victoria since May 2022
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce a permanent Pacific Engagement Visa (PEV) to encourage more permanent migration to Australia from Pacific Island countries
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for introducing a Pacific Engagement Visa (PEV)” which either Nick McKim or Ralph Babet could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nick McKim and Ralph Babet on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Nick McKim | Ralph Babet | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|---|
14th Nov 2023, 12:42 PM – Senate Social Services and Other Legislation Amendment (Australia's Engagement in the Pacific) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
Yes | No | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for introducing a Pacific Engagement Visa (PEV)” which either Nick McKim or Ralph Babet could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Nick McKim | Ralph Babet | Supporters vote | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |