We can't say anything concrete about how Kerry O'Brien voted on increasing consumer protections
How Kerry O'Brien voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation that increases consumer protections by, for example, encouraging competition
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing consumer protections” which Kerry O'Brien could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kerry O'Brien on this policy.
Division | Kerry O'Brien | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
26th Nov 2010, 12:39 PM – Senate Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2010 — Third Reading - Read a third time |
absent | Yes |
24th Nov 2010, 11:05 AM – Senate Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2010 — Second Reading - Read a second time |
absent | Yes |
12th Nov 2008, 11:38 AM – Senate National Fuelwatch (Empowering Consumers) Bill 2008 and related bill — Second Reading — Read a second time |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing consumer protections” which Kerry O'Brien could have attended.
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Kerry O'Brien has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.