We can't say anything concrete about how Jacqui Lambie voted on harm reduction strategies for drug use
How Jacqui Lambie voted compared to someone who agrees that illicit drug use should be met with harm reduction strategies, such as by increasing availability of support programs, sharps containers, overdose prevention methods, or treating drug use as a health issue and not a criminal issue
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for harm reduction strategies for drug use” which Jacqui Lambie could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jacqui Lambie on this policy.
| Division | Jacqui Lambie | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
5th Sep 2017, 5:24 PM – Senate Motions - International Overdose Awareness Day - Address harms of drug use |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for harm reduction strategies for drug use” which Jacqui Lambie could have attended.
| Division | Jacqui Lambie | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
17th Oct 2023, 4:37 PM – Senate Committees - Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee; Reference - ACT Government’s Drugs of Dependence (Personal Use) Amendment Act 2022 |
No | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Jacqui Lambie has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.