We can't say anything concrete about how Jacqui Lambie voted on pill testing
How Jacqui Lambie voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should develop and implement a pill testing policy to reduce the risk of death and/or injury caused by taking illicit drugs
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for pill testing” which Jacqui Lambie could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jacqui Lambie on this policy.
| Division | Jacqui Lambie | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for pill testing” which Jacqui Lambie could have attended.
| Division | Jacqui Lambie | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
5th Sep 2017, 5:24 PM – Senate Motions - International Overdose Awareness Day - Address harms of drug use |
absent | Yes |
13th Feb 2017, 4:05 PM – Senate Motions - Illicit Drugs - Pill testing |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Jacqui Lambie was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.