We can't say anything concrete about how Eric Abetz voted on Extended Supervision Orders (ESOs)
How Eric Abetz voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce Extended Supervision Orders (ESOs) that impose conditions on a person who has been convicted of certain terrorist offences and subsequently released, if the court is satisfied that there is an unacceptable risk that the person will commit certain serious terrorism offences in the community
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for Extended Supervision Orders (ESOs)” which Eric Abetz could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Eric Abetz on this policy.
| Division | Eric Abetz | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
22nd Nov 2021, 9:50 PM – Senate Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment (High Risk Terrorist Offenders) Bill 2021 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for Extended Supervision Orders (ESOs)” which Eric Abetz could have attended.
| Division | Eric Abetz | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Eric Abetz was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.