How Eric Abetz voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should cease paying allowances to former Governor-Generals if they are found to have engaged in serious misconduct

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for ending Governor-General allowances for serious misconduct” which Eric Abetz could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Eric Abetz on this policy.

Division Eric Abetz Supporters vote

3rd Apr 2019, 8:51 PM – Senate Governor-General Amendment (Salary) Bill 2019 - Second Reading - Serious misconduct

absent Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for ending Governor-General allowances for serious misconduct” which Eric Abetz could have attended.

Division Eric Abetz Supporters vote

3rd Apr 2019, 8:55 PM – Senate Governor-General Amendment (Salary) Bill 2019 - Second Reading - No allowances where serious misconduct

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Eric Abetz was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.