How Eric Abetz voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should tighten the ministerial code of conduct to stop former ministers from taking up lobbying positions - including in-house positions - within five years of leaving Parliament

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for stopping former ministers from taking lobbying positions within five years” which Eric Abetz could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Eric Abetz on this policy.

Division Eric Abetz Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for stopping former ministers from taking lobbying positions within five years” which Eric Abetz could have attended.

Division Eric Abetz Supporters vote

22nd Jul 2019, 3:55 PM – Senate Committees - Finance and Public Administration References Committee - Reference

absent Yes

19th Sep 2018, 3:58 PM – Senate Motions - Lobbying to Political Parties - Change definition of "lobbyist"

absent Yes

19th Sep 2018, 3:54 PM – Senate Motions - Lobbying to Political Parties - Change definition of "lobbyist"

absent Yes

18th Sep 2018, 4:58 PM – Senate Motions - Ministerial Conduct - Tighten

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Eric Abetz was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.