Compare how Eric Abetz and Dean Smith voted on a review of our representatives' eligibility

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a review of our representatives' eligibility” which either Eric Abetz or Dean Smith could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Eric Abetz and Dean Smith on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Eric Abetz Dean Smith Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a review of our representatives' eligibility” which either Eric Abetz or Dean Smith could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Eric Abetz Dean Smith Supporters vote

5th Sep 2017, 5:17 PM – Senate Committees - Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee - Reference

absent No Yes

4th Sep 2017, 10:50 AM – Senate Motions - Parliamentary Representation - Qualifications of Senators

No No Yes

15th Aug 2017, 3:53 PM – Senate Committees - Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee - Reference

No No Yes

9th Aug 2017, 4:42 PM – Senate Committees - Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee - Reference

absent No Yes