Compare how Claire Chandler and Sam McMahon voted on reducing taxes for middle-income earners

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for reducing taxes for middle-income earners” which either Claire Chandler or Sam McMahon could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Claire Chandler and Sam McMahon on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Claire Chandler	Sam McMahon	Supporters vote
4th Jul 2019, 5:39 PM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Relief So Working Australians Keep More of Their Money) Bill 2019 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea	Yes	Yes	Yes
4th Jul 2019 – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Relief So Working Australians Keep More of Their Money) Bill 2019 - Third Reading - Pass the bill	Yes	Yes	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for reducing taxes for middle-income earners” which either Claire Chandler or Sam McMahon could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Claire Chandler	Sam McMahon	Supporters vote
no votes listed