We can't say anything concrete about how Catryna Bilyk voted on increasing indexation of HECS-HELP debts
How Catryna Bilyk voted compared to someone who agrees that Higher Education Loan Programme (HELP) debts - also known as HECS-HELP debts - should be indexed in line with the ten-year bond rate, capped at six per cent, instead of the generally lower rate of the Consumer Price Index (CPI)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing indexation of HECS-HELP debts” which Catryna Bilyk could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Catryna Bilyk on this policy.
Division | Catryna Bilyk | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
2nd Dec 2014, 5:58 PM – Senate Higher Education and Research Reform Amendment Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Agree with the main idea of the bill |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing indexation of HECS-HELP debts” which Catryna Bilyk could have attended.
Division | Catryna Bilyk | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
20th Jun 2023, 12:43 PM – Senate Education Legislation Amendment (Startup Year and Other Measures) Bill 2023 - in Committee - Abolishing indexation |
No | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Catryna Bilyk has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.