We can't say anything concrete about how Catryna Bilyk voted on an independent inquiry into Attorney-General Christian Porter
How Catryna Bilyk voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should establish an independent inquiry into whether Attorney-General Christian Porter is fit to remain in his role in light of the recent sexual assault allegation
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for an independent inquiry into Attorney-General Christian Porter” which Catryna Bilyk could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Catryna Bilyk on this policy.
| Division | Catryna Bilyk | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
22nd Jun 2021, 4:14 PM – Senate Ministerial Suitability Commission of Inquiry Bill 2021 - First Reading - Consider the bill without delay |
absent | Yes |
16th Jun 2021, 4:00 PM – Senate Ministerial Suitability Commission of Inquiry Bill 2021 - First Reading - Consider the bill |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for an independent inquiry into Attorney-General Christian Porter” which Catryna Bilyk could have attended.
| Division | Catryna Bilyk | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
17th Mar 2021, 4:59 PM – Senate Motions - Independent Inquiry into Sexual Assault Allegations - Attorney-General |
absent | Yes |
16th Mar 2021, 4:38 PM – Senate Motions - Attorney-General - Independent inquiry |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Catryna Bilyk was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.