We can't say anything concrete about how Catryna Bilyk voted on an independent ABC
How Catryna Bilyk voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should make sure that the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) is independent and free of political interference
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for an independent ABC” which Catryna Bilyk could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Catryna Bilyk on this policy.
| Division | Catryna Bilyk | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for an independent ABC” which Catryna Bilyk could have attended.
| Division | Catryna Bilyk | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
14th Sep 2023, 11:44 AM – Senate Documents - Australian Broadcasting Corporation Coronation coverage - Order for the Production of Documents |
absent | No |
16th Oct 2018, 3:56 PM – Senate Committees - Environment and Communications References Committee - Refer to Committee (ABC + political interference) |
absent | Yes |
16th Oct 2018, 3:41 PM – Senate Committees - Finance and Public Administration References Committee - Refer to Committee (ABC + political interference) |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Catryna Bilyk was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.