How Catryna Bilyk voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should implement the Coalition's new funding policy, proposed under Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull and dubbed "Gonski 2.0", so that it replaces the previous Labor Government's Gonski agreements

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the Coalition's new schools funding policy ("Gonski 2.0")” which Catryna Bilyk could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Catryna Bilyk on this policy.

Division Catryna Bilyk Supporters vote

22nd Jun 2017, 9:58 PM – Senate Australian Education Amendment Bill 2017 - in Committee - Agree with the bill's main idea

absent Yes

22nd Jun 2017, 1:02 AM – Senate Australian Education Amendment Bill 2017 - Third Reading - Pass the bill

absent Yes

21st Jun 2017, 12:27 PM – Senate Australian Education Amendment Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea

absent Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the Coalition's new schools funding policy ("Gonski 2.0")” which Catryna Bilyk could have attended.

Division Catryna Bilyk Supporters vote

21st Jun 2017, 12:23 PM – Senate Australian Education Amendment Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Criticism of Gonski 2.0

absent No

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Catryna Bilyk was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.