We can't say anything concrete about how Tim Storer voted on increasing Aboriginal land rights
How Tim Storer voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander land rights by, for example, increasing their legal recognition and protection
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing Aboriginal land rights” which Tim Storer could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Tim Storer on this policy.
| Division | Tim Storer | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing Aboriginal land rights” which Tim Storer could have attended.
| Division | Tim Storer | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
21st Mar 2018, 3:58 PM – Senate Motions - Queensland: Native Title - Adani Indigenous Land Use Agreement |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Tim Storer was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.