We can't say anything concrete about how Tim Storer voted on tobacco plain packaging
How Tim Storer voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce plain packaging for tobacco products
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for tobacco plain packaging” which Tim Storer could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Tim Storer on this policy.
Division | Tim Storer | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
18th Sep 2018, 1:13 PM – Senate Tobacco Plain Packaging Amendment Bill 2018 - in Committee - Require manufacturer consent for plain packaging |
absent | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for tobacco plain packaging” which Tim Storer could have attended.
Division | Tim Storer | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Tim Storer was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.