We can't say anything concrete about how Stirling Griff voted on ending immigration detention on Manus Island
How Stirling Griff voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should close its Manus Regional Processing Centre and stop all Manus-based processing of people's claims for asylum
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for ending immigration detention on Manus Island” which Stirling Griff could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Stirling Griff on this policy.
Division | Stirling Griff | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for ending immigration detention on Manus Island” which Stirling Griff could have attended.
Division | Stirling Griff | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
26th Aug 2020, 4:14 PM – Senate Motions - Immigration Detention - Moment of silence for deaths |
Yes | Yes |
15th Feb 2018, 11:56 AM – Senate Motions - Asylum Seekers - End offshore detention |
absent | Yes |
20th Jun 2017, 4:00 PM – Senate Motions - Asylum Seekers - Close Nauru and Manus Is. detention centres |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Stirling Griff has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.