How Skye Kakoschke-Moore voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should give approval for new mines in the Liverpool Plains, such as the Shenhua Watermark coal mine

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for giving approval for mining in the Liverpool Plains” which Skye Kakoschke-Moore could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Skye Kakoschke-Moore on this policy.

Division Skye Kakoschke-Moore Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for giving approval for mining in the Liverpool Plains” which Skye Kakoschke-Moore could have attended.

Division Skye Kakoschke-Moore Supporters vote

15th Nov 2017, 3:59 PM – Senate Motions - Coal Seam Gas Mining: Liverpool Plains - Moratorium

Yes No

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Skye Kakoschke-Moore has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.