We can't say anything concrete about how Robert Simms voted on increasing trade unions' powers in the workplace
How Robert Simms voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation that increases the powers and influence of trade unions in workplace relations
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing trade unions' powers in the workplace” which Robert Simms could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Robert Simms on this policy.
| Division | Robert Simms | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing trade unions' powers in the workplace” which Robert Simms could have attended.
| Division | Robert Simms | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
18th Apr 2016, 6:23 PM – Senate Building and Construction Industry (Improving Productivity) Bill 2013 [No. 2] and one other - Second Reading - Agree with the bills' main idea |
No | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Robert Simms has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.